{
  "schema_version": "1.1",
  "artifact_revision": "release-2026-11-11-r12",
  "record_type": "fictional_illustration",
  "method_reference": {
    "guide_id": "review-agent-skills",
    "build_revision": "release-2026-11-11-r12",
    "source_sha256": "626c5c483fb76c03470403a18ec7cffa7532bba67ede83b8cfefb88c35caba77"
  },
  "recommendation": "keep",
  "task": "Evaluate whether to add the proposed always-on brief-writing skill in this fictional scenario.",
  "scope_and_version": "Three illustrative weekly briefs and the proposed additional process. No real task dataset.",
  "current_authorization": "Fictional read-only review. No installation, system change or communication is authorized.",
  "required_checks": [
    {
      "check": "Does the current workflow meet its stated brief contract in the illustration?",
      "observed_evidence": "Fictional inspection: three illustrative briefs contain the required sources, uncertainties and next action. This is not an observed dataset.",
      "evidence_reference": "Fictional scenario statement 1; not a real execution log.",
      "status": "pass"
    },
    {
      "check": "Is the presence or absence of a recurring gap or review burden explicitly recorded before recommending more process?",
      "observed_evidence": "The fictional review explicitly identifies no demonstrated recurring gap. This satisfies the check to state the gap status, not a proof that failures never occur.",
      "evidence_reference": "Fictional scenario statements 2 and 3; not independent evidence.",
      "status": "pass"
    },
    {
      "check": "Does the decision retain current controls and specify when to reopen?",
      "observed_evidence": "Reopen when an actual repeated failure or measurable owner-review burden is documented. Compare the smallest targeted change against the same competent baseline before expanding the workflow.",
      "evidence_reference": "The illustrative recommendation and reopening condition in this sample.",
      "status": "pass"
    }
  ],
  "decision": "accept",
  "decision_reason": "The fictional decision record meets these stated review requirements. Its recommendation is keep, not install. Accept here does not verify real evidence or grant authority.",
  "next_authorized_action": "In the scenario, leave the current workflow unchanged. If an actual recurring failure is later documented, prepare a bounded comparison within the existing authorization.",
  "stop_or_recovery": "Do not install the proposed skill or weaken existing checks based on this example.",
  "limitations": [
    "Every scenario observation is fictional. No real briefs, customer outcomes or agent trial were evaluated.",
    "Keep is a bounded recommendation for this scenario, not proof that added structure is always wasteful.",
    "The record establishes neither evidence truth nor permission to change a system."
  ]
}